Published On: Wed, Jul 18th, 2012

The Wahhabi Invasion of Sri Lanka

Column by Stephen Suleyman Schwartz with Irfan Al-Alawi

To many non-Muslims, the existence of an Islamic community on the island of Sri Lanka may be surprising.  Sri Lanka has been known for the past three decades as the scene of an atrocious civil war. Its Buddhist Sinhala majority, with 69.1 percent of the national population of 21.5 million, was challenged by Tamils – 7.1 percent, and mainly Hindu in religion, whom the secessionist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam or “Tamil Tigers” aspired to represent. The “Tamil Tigers” were defeated militarily in 2009.

But Sri Lanka also counts 7.6 percent of its people as Muslims, and among them, as elsewhere throughout South Asia, the spiritual tradition of Sufism is vigorously present.  After 1973, and the Arab oil embargo that enriched Saudi Arabia greatly, the ultra-fundamentalist Wahhabi sect, which is the official religious interpretation in the Saudi kingdom, began to penetrate Sri Lanka’s adherents to Islam.  The Wahhabis in Sri Lanka act through a movement called Thawheed, or Monotheism.  They opened numerous medresas.  They despise Sufis.

According to M.C.A. Hameed, president of the All Ceylon Thareekathul Mufliheen, a Sufi order whose name means “path of the fearless victorious,” Sri Lankan Muslims then began to find employment in Saudi Arabia, and many young Sri Lankan Muslims were awarded scholarships by Saudi universities.  But “those who completed their studies returned to Sri Lanka and… propagat[ed] the ideology” of Wahhabism, Hameed says.  Further, “to pursue their goal the Wahhabis resorted to violence and intimidation culminating in death and destruction.  Our religious society… was not spared and had to face untold hardship.”

The All Ceylon Thareekathul Mufliheen was founded in the late 1980s by Sheihul Mufliheen M.S.M. Abdullah, known as “Rah,” in the southeastern Sri Lanka village of Maruthamunai.  It was registered as a cultural society with the civil authorities in 1989.  The headquarters of Thareekathul Mufliheen is now located in the small eastern coast village of Kattankudy, which has 42 mosques.  The order maintains branches around the island, and claims 15,000 members.

Hameed states that the “vision” of Thareekathul Mufliheen is “to expound the true meaning of ‘kalimathuth thayiba,’ the ‘fragrant sacred words.’”  These words are “la ilaha illallah,” the essence of Islam, meaning “there is nothing but God.”  In the teachings of Thareekathul Mufliheen, “This word Allah (God) denotes a great power, unbound by time and space, infinite and beyond human imagination.  The creation is only the manifestation of this eternal truth and [is] not separate from it.”

This principle underlies the doctrines of Thareekathul Mufliheen, but its founder denied exerting any compulsion anywhere to embrace his views, given that each human being is free to choose a path of faith.  In 1980, Abdullah (Rah) published a book in Tamil titled “Imanin Unmaiyai Nee Arivaya,” or “Do You Know the Truth of Iman?” – “iman” referring to Islamic belief.  The country’s official Council of Islamic Scholars, the All Ceylon Jamiathul Ulama, purportedly without reading the book or holding a hearing to examine it, published a fatwa or religious opinion on September 10, 1989, declaring Abdullah (Rah) and his followers as “murtadd” or apostates, who renounced Islam, in the judgment of the clerics.

Abdullah (Rah) filed a defamation suit against the All Ceylon Jamiathul Ulama in 1990 in Colombo, the Sri Lankan capital.  Many hearings later, in 1996, the All Ceylon Jamiathul Ulama revoked the fatwa and settled the complaint. In a similar act of discrimination, members of Thareekathul Mufliheen were denied registration of marriages and burial of the dead in conformity with Islamic practice, but through legal action these rights were restored, at least on paper.   A book by Abdullah (Rah) translated into English, “The Court of Reason,” was published in 2010.

Thareekathul Mufliheen opened a Meditation Centre at Kattankudy in 1996. On May 29 of that year, at 1 A.M. in the morning, Wahhabi arson struck the building.  Abdullah (Rah) and the members of the order were targets of shooting and grenade attacks, and other physical aggression, as well as threats.  Worse was to come.  On October 31, 2004, at 12:30 p.m., 500 Wahhabis organized under the title “Jihad” again set the Meditation Centre ablaze, destroying its library, along with homes and businesses owned by Sufis.   Financial loss to the injured parties was considerable, and one Sufi was shot and killed while another was wounded by gunfire.  Thareekathul Mufliheen’s president Hameed accuses police of assisting the assailants. Eight alleged perpetrators were arrested, but were released on bail with no further consequences.  A complaint was entered at Police Headquarters in Colombo in 2004, and a subsequent protest was filed with the Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission (HRC) in 2005.

The HRC found in favor of the Sufis, stating that their constitutional right to adhere to the belief of their will and choice had been violated, and submitting recommendations for redress to the Inspector General of Police.  But Thareekathul Mufliheen asserts, “Sadly, the Police were inactive in implementing these recommendations in an equitable manner.”  Still, the Meditation Centre and headquarters were rebuilt and a birthday celebration for the founder of the order was held on July 25, 2006, with 15,000 people provided free food.

Sheihul Mufliheen M.S.M. Abdullah (Rah) died on December 6, 2006. Wahhabi preachers from the Thawheed network and the armed “Jihad” incited the local clerics and politicians (Jamiathul Ulama Kattankudy, the Muslim Federation of Mosques, and the Urban Council of Kattankudy) to oppose his burial according to Islamic rites, in the Meditation Centre, as he was a supposed “apostate.”    Another member of the Sufi order had died on December 1, 2006, was buried that day, and on December 2 was exhumed by Wahhabis on the same pretext and laid out on the soil. According to the Wahhabis and their accomplices, “apostates” could not be buried in Kattankudy.

The Jihadis, armed with lethal weapons, rioted after the death of Abdullah (Rah), bringing life in Kattankudy to a halt by a general work stoppage (hartal). Schools, government and private offices, banks and businesses shut down and some banks and shops were looted and burned. The official clerics of All Ceylon Jamiathul Ulama, Jamiathul Ulama Kattankudy, the Muslim Federation of Mosques, other Islamic organizations, and the Kattankudy Urban Council initiated a judicial argument on December 11, 2006.  They denounced the interment of Abdullah (Rah) as defying Muslim norms and traditions and charged that Thareekathul Mufliheen had failed to seek permission from the authorities for the burial. The petition by the official clerics and Wahhabis was dismissed in 2007.  But the Sri Lanka HRC declared in 2007 that it could not “interfere in the disputes between various sects of a religion” and recommended the conflict be referred to the Council of Ulemas – All Ceylon Jamiathul Ulama, or to the Ministry of Religious Affairs.

In a separate controversy, the Urban Council in Kattankudy had ordered the dismantling of the minaret at the Meditation Centre, as an “unauthorized structure,” in a decision announced on December 13, 2006.  Police prevented commencement of the demolition, but Wahhabi fanatics interfered with the officers.  Three rioters were shot and killed.  A police post and police vehicle were assaulted.  On December 15, 2006, nevertheless, members of the Urban Council joined a Wahhabi mob that invaded the Meditation Centre and knocked down the minaret, removing the body of Abdullah (Rah), either burning or reburying it in a location yet unknown.   The houses of 117 Sufis were leveled by fire.  Many were threatened and fled the district. Two were injured, and one lost an arm.

Evidence of persecution of Thareekathul Mufliheen was submitted to Asma Jahangir, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, during a visit she made to Sri Lanka.  In her 2008 Report to the UN, the Special Rapporteur expressed “regrets that she has not received a reply from the Government [of Sri Lanka]” regarding the 2006 incidents.  She affirmed that “the Government of Sri Lanka has to fulfill its positive obligation to protect the right to freedom of religion or belief of all its citizens… in most of the cases that have been brought to her attention… these obligations have not been satisfactorily fulfilled by the Government.”

The 2007 International Religious Freedom Report issued by the U.S. Department of State noted the Wahhabi interference with Thareekathul Mufliheen. Since then, however, abuses against the Sufis of Kattankudy have continued, with the Wahhabi Thawheed faction in the forefront of violence.   Official ulema and the village authorities attempted unsuccessfully to prevent celebration of a Sufi festival in 2008.   That year, a Sri Lanka Supreme Court order, providing that 200 members of Thareekathul Mufliheen be allowed to return to their homes in Kattankudy and practice their beliefs in freedom, was obstructed by armed Jihad members.

In February 2009 a 150-year old shrine was destroyed by Thawheed in the city of Ukuwela, in the central hill country of Sri Lanka.  Conflict in July 2009 between Thawheed and the Qadiri Sufi order, in the southwestern town of Beruwala, led to two deaths, more than 40 people injured, and 132 arrests.   The Qadiri devotees complained that the Wahhabi mosque in their town, named Masjidur Rahman (Mosque of the Merciful) had accused the Qadiris of the Bukhari Thakkiya mosque of being “qafirun” (“disbelievers” or “concealers of the truth”) continuously in the eight years since the Wahhabi mosque was inaugurated.

According to the Sri Lanka newspaper The Sunday Times of August 16, 2009, Muslim Home Guards recruited by the Sri Lankan government to fight the Tamil rebels had deserted with their weapons and joined Thawheed to fulfill its demand for “Jihad” against traditional Muslims.  The newspaper described a significant influx of Wahhabi preachers and activists from south India and Saudi Arabia.  Riyad S. Al-Khenene, counsellor of the Royal Saudi Embassy in Sri Lanka, denied that official Saudi support was granted to the Wahhabi interlopers, while admitting that “certain wealthy persons… are helping various religious groups in Sri Lanka to put up mosques.  But this has nothing to do with the Government of Saudi Arabia,” Al-Khenene insisted.

In response to the campaign against it, Thareekathul Mufliheen has appealed to the Sri Lanka authorities for an impartial inquiry into Wahhabi activities in the country; to disarm the Wahhabis; to provide for reconstruction of the headquarters of Thareekathul Mufliheen in Kattankudy; to enforce the revocation of the fatwa issued by the All Ceylon Jamiathul Ulama against Abdullah (Rah) and his disciples, as ordered by the Colombo District Court, and to compensate the displaced Sufis, facilitating restoration of their lost heritage, ruined homes, and businesses.  The Sufis of Kattankudy seek “peaceful resettlement with honor.”

Thareekathul Mufliheen defines itself as “a peace loving and non-violent Religious Society… The members have displayed their patience and tolerance even in times of grave injustice and calamity…  The words of wisdom of our spiritual leader are to detest arms and adopt peaceful means to find a solution in a crisis situation.”

The Wahhabi, Deobandi, and Mawdudist jihad trends have revealed their ambition to control South Asian Islam through violence in Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh.  In all these countries traditionalists resist them.  The Sufis of Sri Lanka, although obscure to the rest of the world, deserve no less support than anti-radical Muslims elsewhere in the region and around the globe.

  • N.S. Rajaram

    A very informative article but a small observation. The LTTE leadership and war was dominated by Christians, especially the Catholic Church. Prabhakaran himself was a Christian, as was Miss Dhanu (Thannimozi Rajaratnam) the suicide bomber who killed Rajiv Gandhi. (According to Dr. Subramanian Swamy, Sonia Gandhi’s part in this is still murky.)

    The LTTE was and is driven by the same anti-Hindu Dravidian ideology as the Dravidian parties of 20 years ago. Its website still carries the Aryan invasion theory which has been given up by everyone except the missionaries. They have sought to misrepresent and even falsify genetic data claiming that DNA evidence shows a massive influx of ‘Aryans’ 3500 – 3000 years ago. (There is no such thing as Aryan gene or DNA.)

    Quite early, the LTTE had joined hands with Radio Veritas (‘Truth Radio’), which is a Catholic oufit run by the Asian Bishops Council. The LTTE controlled VOT (‘Voice of Tiger’) quite established a coordinating office to tie up with Radio Veritas at St. Sebastian Church in Mallavi.

    The strongest supporters of LTTE in Sri Lanka have always been the Tamil Christian clergy– Catholic, Anglican, Methodist and evangelical. And as in the notorious fake ‘Church bombings’ in Karnataka a decade ago in which the christian propagandists took the help of the Islamist Deen Dar Anjuman, these Christian organizations have not hesitated to take the help of Islamist outfits.

    This shows LTTE leadership to be anti-Hindu and anti-Buddhist in character. It would not surprise me to learn that these Wahabi-Jihadis are being sponsored and supported by what is left of the LTTE leadership and money worldwide.

    • Nalliah Thayabharan

      Saudi Arabia has the second-highest divorce-rate in the world, Polygamy is responsible for more than 60% of divorces. Loss of trust, sincerity, compassion and cooperation were also factors in the failure of marriages.
      http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/01/120124093142.htm&date=2012-03-12
      One of the most disturbing things about Islam is that it does not categorically condemn pedophilia. Indeed, it cannot, for to do so would draw attention to the pedophilia of Muhammad, the founder of Islam. Many Muslims cannot condemn pedophilia even if they would like to, for they would have to abandon Islam. Muslims tacitly approve of pedophilia, even if they are embarrassed to say so. So mesmerized are Muslims by the example of Muhammad’s pedophilia that they are unable to categorically denounce pedophilia or feel shame. It is prevalent in many Muslim countries disguised as child marriage. The UN is today trying to stop the evil of child marriage among the backward Islamic regions of Asia and Africa. The future of some 300 million young girls depends on it.

      • Nalliah Thayabharan

        One of the most rigid and reactionary sects in all of Islam today is
        Wahhabism. It is the official and dominant sect in Saudi Arabia whose
        sole constitution is the Holy Qur’an.

        Wahhabism and Saudi Arabia’s ruling House of Saud have been
        intimately and permanently intertwined since their births. Wahhabism
        created the Saudi monarchy, and the House of Saud spread Wahhabism. One
        could not have existed without the other. Wahhabism gives the House of
        Saud legitimacy, and the House of Saud protects and promotes Wahhabism.
        The two are inseparable because each supports the other and depends on
        it for survival.

        Unlike Islam in other Muslim countries, however, Wahhabism treats
        women as third class citizens, imposes the veil on them, and denies
        them basic human rights such as: driving cars; the freedom of traveling
        within the country or leaving it without permission or Mahram (“a
        relative male chaperon”); the interaction with men who are not related
        to them in order to maintain a complete separation of the sexes; and
        until a few decades ago denied them public education and banned them
        from Radio and Television.

        In addition, unlike other Islamic sects, Wahhabism outlaws the
        celebration of Almoulid (Prophet Mohammad’s Birthday); forbids religious
        freedom, opposes political freedom of expression by constantly
        admonishing Saudis to obey their leaders (who are not even elected);
        bans movie theaters; forces the public and businesses to observe
        prayers; cows the masses by publicly using the harshest Islamic
        punishments (applied mostly to the poor, like all other punishments)
        such as the beheading for convicted killers and the hand-amputation for
        thieves; denies the Saudi citizenship to non-Muslims; and condoned
        slavery until the 1960s. Wahhabism also abhors smoking, singing, and
        dancing. To ensure full compliance of its stern ordinances, the Wahhabi
        “Committee for the Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice” with
        its religious police keeps a watchful eye on the Saudi public.

        Wahhabism is highly self-centered and extremely intolerant of
        progressive ideologies, other religions, and other Islamic sects such as
        Shiism and Sufism. It despises Arab Nationalism with a great deal of
        passion, yet it promotes “Saudi” nationalism, despite the fact that any
        nationalism is considered a violation of Islamic theology due to the
        concept of Islamic Ummah (“nation”). Wahhabism considers itself to be
        the only correct way in all of Islam, and any Muslim who opposes it as
        heretic or non-believer

  • Nalliah Thayabharan

    In Saudi Arabia there is no Church, Synagogue, Buddhist nor
    Hindu Temple is allowed. Wahhabism (pseudo Salafism) is NOT a religion of tolerance? Wahhabism provides
    the fundamental base for Jihadism.

    It is not Iran that should be bombed. In Iran there are
    still Jews living there and praying in their Synagogues.

    Muammar al-Gaddafi respected Christian and Jewish religions
    and their Churches, Synagogues in Libya but American, English, French, Saudi and Qatari
    financed terrorists destroyed Churches, Synagogues recently.

    Buddhist Temples have survived in Islamic countries for
    centuries, but they could not survive under the Wahhabism.

    Washington and London are protecting Wahhabi extremists. In
    Syria Christians and their Churches were safe before the Westerners began
    sending their Wahhabi fanatics to kill innocent Syrian civilians.

    In Bosnia and Kosovo, under the guise of “reconstruction
    aid”, Saudi Arabia, Kuwaiti, and other Wahhabi organizations have demolished
    and removed major Islamic monuments (survived attacks by Serb and Croat
    militias) which were created by Muslims with an Islamic culture and tradition
    stretching back to 14th century long before Ibn Abd al-Wahhab made his 18th
    century alliance with the warlord Ibn Saud who founded the House of Saud.

    The Wahhabis, and the British, supported the warlord Ibn
    Saud and legitimized the Saudi dynasty and its struggle against the Turkey.
    When the House of Saud took control of the Holy Places in Arabia from the
    Turkey with British support they destroyed 15 centuries of Islamic heritage,
    including the desecration of the tombs of the wives and companions of the Holy
    Prophet, in the iconoclastic imposition of Wahhabism. The iconoclastic Wahhabi
    House of Saud turned the site of the apartments of the Prophet’s wives into a
    parking lot.

    The Wahhabi-backed House of Saud took full control of the
    Hijaz, Mecca and Medina, in 1924 and established the modern state of Saudi
    Arabia, with Wahhabism as its official religion. Since then the House of Saud
    has promoted Wahhabism as normative Islam throughout the Islamic world. The
    House of Saud was consolidated on massive oil wealth and have spent huge sums
    of money building Wahhabi mosques, publishing Wahhabi literature and funding
    Wahhabi organizations world-wide. Today, with Wahhabi control of the Holy
    Places intact, virtually every aspect and corner of modern Islam has been
    penetrated by Wahhabi influence through the agency of the House of Saud.

    Through the control of the Hajj – the beating heart of Islam
    – and through their vigorous publication and propaganda means, almost all the
    Muslims are infected with Wahhabism to some extent.

    Present Zionist and Wahhabi doctrines foresee the fall of
    Iran, Belarus, and, ultimately Russia and China, after the fall of Damascus, to
    the combined forces of NATO and the Saudi- and Qatari-backed Wahhabis, who make
    up a large portion of the anti Syrian movement.

    It is sadly true
    but there is a rising trend of Wahhabi Jihadism in Sri Lanka. Wahhabis are
    trying to take the peaceful Islamic community in Sri Lanka down the path of
    extremism and violence. The Wahhabis have already created
    deep divisions in among Sri Lankan Muslims and have formed gangs that
    intimidate moderate Muslims who speak out against Wahhabi fanatics. Like the
    Christian fundamentalist groups using NGOs to convert innocent poor families to
    Christianity, Wahhabis help poor Muslim families by providing cash and other
    material benefits to convert the innocent poor Muslim families into their cult.
    Wahhabis even use Government Cultural Affairs Department to continue their
    nefarious activities.

    Wahhabis claim that moderate Sri Lankan Muslims do not know
    anything of Islam and only themselves are the real scholars of Islam. But Wahhabis preach only “dawah” of
    hatred, terror and murder. To understand the deranged mentality of Wahhabis
    look at the “fitna” the Wahhabis have caused in Pakistan. The Government authorities must investigate
    every Wahhabi school and propagandist in the Eastern Province to make sure they
    are not preaching things that are inimical to Sri Lanka. Saudi Arabia remains a
    critical financial support base for al-Qaida, Taliban, Lashkar-e-Taiba and
    other Wahhabi terrorist groups. Saudi Arabia spends 87 billion US dollar per
    year to spread Wahhabism world-wide. Scholarships are offered to our Muslims
    youths to go to Wahhabi institutions in Saudi Arabia. But those who completed
    their Wahhabi studies
    returned to Sri Lanka and propagate Wahhabism.

    Wahhabis have infiltrated Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corporation
    (SLBC). Almost all the participants and staffers in the Muslim section of Sri
    Lanka Broadcasting Corporation are Wahabis and use the State radio to propagate
    Wahhabism. Not only Wahhabis run private
    unlicensed radio stations in the Eastern Province, also armed Wahhabis often
    attack mosques and leaders of the Sufi sect.

    Wahhabism in Srilanka is headquartered in Kattankudi is a
    new politico-religious movement that is sweeping the Eastern province of Sri
    Lanka with more than sixty Muslim Wahhabi organizations helping in propagating
    the movement throughout Sri Lanka and has raced ahead and taken control of the
    Jihadist and Al Fatah groups in Sri Lanka under their wings. Wahhabism is
    imported and planted in the midst of peace-loving Muslims in Sri Lanka, mostly
    through the lavish inflow of Saudi money pumped into Sri Lanka has overtaken
    other Islamic organizations by threats, intimidation and coercion.

    Remember Colonel Lateef was gun down by the prominent
    Wahhabi militant `Police` Faiz in Oddamavadi. CIA introduced Wahhabism in Sri
    Lanka through Saudi Arabia as a means of countering the growing support for
    Iran and Sufism among the Sri Lankan Muslims since CIA had calculated that
    Wahhabism would be an effective rival theology to prevent the spread of Iranian
    influence in Sri Lanka.

    Clashes between Sufis and Wahhabi Muslims in Kattankudi and
    in Oddamavadi occured on a regular basis due to the conflict of beliefs between
    both religious theologies. In October 2004 similar clashes occurred in
    Kattankudi and more than 200 homes of Sufi followers were burnt down by Wahhabi
    Jihadists.

    One of the Sufi leaders Abdul Payilvan died in Colombo was
    buried at in Kattankudi the next day. Wahhabi Muslims observed a hartal and
    demanded the removal of the body from the burial grounds. Wahhabi Muslims claim
    Kattankudy soil is sacred and bodies belonging to those who preach views
    contradictory to Wahhabism should not be buried there. Wahhabis demanded that
    the body of Abdul Payilvan, who is from Maruthamunai in the Ampara district,
    should be exhumed and buried elsewhere.

    Wahhabis had dug up the buried body of another Sufi Muslim
    from Mosque burial grounds and dumped the body on a local road as an act of
    protest. Kattankudi Police recovered the body, re-buried it in the original
    burial ground and guarded burial ground for few days.

    In Kattankudi, the hatred between Wahhabis and Sufis has
    widened in the last few years and has grown in intensity, left many injured,
    and caused damage to several houses and vehicles.

    Saudi agents have successfully penetrated the Eastern
    province Muslims social fabric and have managed to defeat the Sufism in their
    game. Due to the training afforded by the House of Saud now the Wahhabis have
    prevailed over the Sufis. The Muslims in Sri Lanka have been subdued due to the
    Wahhabi influence while Buddhists have been agitating for the release of Rizana
    Naffek – teenage housemaid from Muthur who was sentenced to death by a Wahhabi
    Sharia Court in Saudi Arabia.

    • Nalliah Thayabharan

      “Christians and Jews are the sorcerers who believe in devil worship. The only way to deal with sorcerers is to put them to the sword”.
      - Book of Tawhid” written in the 18th century by Founder of Wahhabism – Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab

      Founder of Wahhabism – Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab – was born in 1703 in the village of Uyaynah, in the central Arabian region of Najd. As a young man Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab studied with his father who was a religious judge. Even at a young age MuhammadIibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab showed extremist religious tendencies.
      In Mecca, the Hanbali mufti, Ibn Humaydi, perceived Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab to be a poor student, and arrogant and defiant with his teachers, which upset his father. Consequently, Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab was expelled
      In Medina, he studied under Muhammad Hayyat Al-Sindhi, who taught Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab to reject the popular veneration of saints and their tombs. He believed that the period during Prophet Mohammed’s time spent in Medina was an ideal Arabic society. He declared war on Shiism, Sufism and Greek philosophy. He even spoke out against visiting the grave of the prophet and celebration of his birthday, declaring that it was imitation of Christmas. He believed that the quality and morality of the Arabs was in decline, so he advocated jihad against Arabic unbelievers as the means for protecting the purity of faith. These ideas had a dramatic influence on Abdul Wahhab, who upon the completion of his studies in Medina traveled to Basra in southern Iraq. His reformist ideas were formulated while living in Basra. He then went to Baghdad, where he married a wealthy bride and settled down for 5 years. He came to the conclusion that Islam practiced throughout the Ottoman Empire and Persia was corrupted by outside influences. For Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab who grew up in the desert of Najd, seeing the extravagance and riches of Ottoman and Persian elite was shocking.
      This was a period of great changes in the Islamic world. The Ottoman Empire has ruled Arabs for centuries. They also expanded their influence deep into the Europe. But that expansion came to an end at the Battle of Vienna in September of 1683 where the combined armies of Germany, Austria, Poland and their allies drove back the besieging Ottoman Army. It marked the turning point in a 250-year struggle between the forces of Christian Europe and the Muslim Ottoman Empire.
      Over the 16 years following the battle, the Ottoman Army would be permanently driven south of the Danube River never to threaten central Europe again. British and Dutch armadas regularly sailed unimpeded into the Persian Gulf. The Islamic world that was led by the Ottoman Empire was in retreat losing ground to Europe.
      Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab attributed the rising power of Europe to the moral degradation of the Ottoman Empire. He felt the main reason for that was the way Islam was practiced and the insufficient devotion to its main tenets. He believed that even though during their earlier conquests the Islamic world has defeated many civilizations, in the process they absorbed many religious practices of the conquered cultures. His main message was oneness of God that was opposite to polytheism, defined as an act of associating any person or any object with powers that should be attributed only to God. He sought to restore the puritanical version of Islam of the Prophet Mohammed and early caliphs. In addition Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab and his followers, who were Arabs, resented the domination of the Ottomans who were Turks.
      After his return Uyayna in 1740, Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab launched a campaign of purification and renewal. His goal was to bring back the purity that Islam enjoyed during the time of the Prophet. One of the main tenets of his doctrine has become an idea of Takfir. Under the Takfir, fellow Arabs could be deemed infidels, if they engaged in religious activities that were different from those propagated by Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab and his followers.
      The following practices were forbidden:
      • Prayers to God by honors to any individual other then God, despite their acceptance by all the previous generations of Arabs, including the Prophet himself
      • Pilgrimage and prayers at burial sites of the Saints Tradition of visiting the tomb of Mohammed in Medina, while making pilgrimage to Mecca
      • Inscription of the Prophet Mohammed’s name on any building or a mosque
      • Building shrines
      Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab denounced all Muslims who would not share his views as polytheists who should be killed, their wives and daughters violated and their possessions confiscated. That list included Shiias, Sufis and other Muslim denominations whom he did not even consider to be Muslims.
      Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab began to attract followers, including the ruler of ‘Uyayna – Ibn Mu’ammar. With Ibn Mu’ammar’s support, Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab began to implement some of his ideas for reform. First, citing Islamic teachings forbidding grave worship, he persuaded Ibn Mu’ammar to level the grave of Zayd ibn al-Khattab, a companion of Muhammad, whose grave was revered by locals. Secondly, he ordered that all adulterors be stoned to death, a practice that had become uncommon in the area. Indeed, he personally organised the stoning of a woman who confessed that she had committed adultery.
      These actions gained the attention of Sulaiman ibn Muhammad ibn Ghurayr of the tribe of Bani Khalid, the chief of Al-Hasa and Qatif, who held substantial influence in Najd. Ibn Ghurayr threatened Ibn Mu’ammar that he would not allow him to collect a land tax for some properties that he owned in Al-Hasa if he did not kill Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab. Although Ibn Mu’ammar declined to do so, Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab was still forced to leave. He was expelled from his own town and in 1741 after some wandering around he found a refuge in the village of Dariyah, not too far from present day Riyadh. There the local tribal chief ruler Ibn Saud welcomed him and offered him a refuge.
      When they first met, Ibn Saud declared:
      “This oasis is yours, do not fear your enemies. By the name of God, if all Nejd was summoned to throw you out, we will never agree to expel you.”
      Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab replied, “You are the settlement’s chief and wise man. I want you to grant me an oath that you will perform jihad (holy war) against the unbelievers. In return you will be imam, leader of the Muslim community and I will be leader in religious matters”.
      Ibn Saud and Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab concluded an agreement that, together, they would bring the Arabs of the peninsula back to the “true” principles of Islam as they saw it. The agreement was confirmed with an oath in 1744. This agreement became a “mutual support pact” and power-sharing arrangement between the Al Saud and the Al ash-Sheikh, which has remained in place for nearly 300 years, providing the ideological impetus to Saudi expansion.
      Two of them made a power sharing deal: Ibn Saud would protect Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab and help him spread his ideology while Wahhab would legitimize Saud’s ambition to rule over neighboring Bedouin tribes, by force if necessary.
      The two sides legitimized their pact by Ibn Saud marrying the daughter of Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab. The agreement also stipulated that power would be shared exclusively by their descendants, thus establishing a dynasty. Interestingly enough Prophet Mohammed never forced his descendants to be the successors of his power.
      Ibn Saud’s clan now could do what they always did, which was raiding the neighboring villages and robbing them of their possessions, but now they were doing it under the pretext of Jihad. Ibn Saud and Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab also reintroduced the idea of martyrdom in the name of Jihad, as it granted the immediate entry into paradise, which is described in the Quran as gardens with rivers of water, milk and honey and filled with dark eyed virgins. That idea won them a great number of followers amongst the local populations.
      Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab imagined himself as a new Prophet who would replace the Ottoman Caliph as the sole theological authority within Islamic ummah, while Ibn Saud imagined himself as a ruler of the entire Arab tribes and beyond. (That fusion of the religious and political power rules in Saudi Arabia to this day). The idea of condemning the enemies as non-believers who had no right to live and need to be conquered set the stage for successful campaign of Wahhabization on the Arabian Peninsula.
      In the beginning they conquered a few local settlements and imposed their rule over them. The unfortunate polytheists had a very limited choice, conversion or death. In 1765 Ibn Saud died and his son Abdul Aziz took over the leadership retaining the association with Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab. By 1790 they reached as far as the coast of the Persian Gulf. By that time the alliance controlled most of the Arabian Peninsula and repeatedly raided Medina, Syria and Iraq.
      Their strategy was to bring the peoples they conquered into the submission. In 1801 Wahhabies attacked the Shiite Holy City of Karbala in Iraq. They massacred thousands of Shiites, including women and children who did not meet the Wahhabi standard of the true Muslim. Many shrines were destroyed including the Tomb of Hussein, the murdered grandson of Prophet Mohammed. Another practice enjoyed by Wahhabies was the burning of books often followed by execution of the people who wrote them.
      After conquering Karbala, the Wahhabies next stop was Mecca. But on the way they had to take the fortress of Taif where the Ottoman governor of Mecca tried to make a last stand. When the residents of Taif realized that they would not be able to hold off a 10,000 strong Wahhabi army they raised a flag of truce. But when Wahhabies entered a city they wiped out practically the entire population. In 1803 Abdul Aziz entered the Holy City of Mecca. He ordered all the mosques and other constructions built to commemorate the prophet and his family to be razed to the ground. He even destroyed the chapel, where according to the legend, Angel Gabriel had brought the first chapter of the Quran to Prophet Mohammed. A year later he took the city of Medina.
      All the historical works of art, including priceless books that survived over millennia were destroyed or stolen. But in November of 1803 a Shiite assassin killed Abdul Aziz taking revenge for the massacre of Karbala. His son Saud bin Abd al Aziz succeeded him and continued the successful conquest of Arabia. Ottoman rulers could no longer sit back and watch as their Empire was losing territories and holy places while the Ottoman subjects were forced into following the Wahhabi ideology. Ottoman Sultan was also serving as caliph.
      This title is used to designate the successor to Prophet Mohammed as the religious and political leader of Sunni Islam. Obviously the Wahhabies did not recognize him as such. In 1811 the Ottomans appointed the Albanian born Governor of Egypt named Mohammed Ali as the person who would lead a campaign against the Wahhabies and take back the holy places. Mohammed Ali did not disappoint the Ottoman Sultan. In 1812 Mohammed Ali’s army was able to liberate Medina. Jeddah and Mecca. .
      In 1814 Saud bin Abd Al Aziz died of fever. His son Abdullah Ibn Saud was taken to Istanbul where he was executed. In 1818 the Ottomans captured and destroyed the Wahhabi capital of Dariyah. The first Saudi state was no more.
      The Ottoman victory and the death of the Abdullah did not mean the end of the Wahhabism. Many pilgrims who visited Mecca and Median during the hajj took the ideas of the Wahhabism back to their homelands. Over the next few years several attempts were made by descendants of Mohammed Ibn Saud to re-establish the control over the Arabia without much success.
      One of those descendants, Faisal bin Turki was captured in 1838 by the Ottomans and send to Egypt where he spent a few years in jail. But when Egypt declared their independence from the Ottoman Empire, they had to withdraw their army from the Arabian Peninsula in order to support their own positions on Egypt.
      Faisal bin Turki escaped from Cairo prison and returned home to Arabia. He was able to reestablish the second Saudi State in 1865. But after his death his sons fought over his succession. Besides the control of Arabian Peninsula, one of the major sticking point in their disagreement was the application of the Wahhabi doctrine. Those disagreements greatly weakened the Saudi State. In 1871 the rival tribal leader Mohammed bin Rashid made a pact with the Ottomans and started a campaign of taking back the territories from the Saud family. In 1891, with the fall of Riyadh, the takeover of the Saudi land was complete.
      The Saud family was forced into exile and eventually settled in Kuwait. But even the Rashides showed some interest in Wahhabi ideas as they allowed several Wahhabi scholars to continue their teachings in schools and in mosques. .
      As the role of the Ottoman Empire was diminishing, the British were gaining a lot of influence in the region. In the years to come they would carve up the entire region according to their view of the world. In many ways those views were narrow-sighted and did not take into consideration the religious and ethnic difference of the local populations.
      Warlord Abdulaziz raided many places in Najd to feed his family. On the night of January 15, 1902, 26 years old warlord Abdulaziz led 40 men climbed over the walls of the city of Riyadh on tilted palm trees and took the city of Riyadh. The Rashidi governor of the city of Riyadh, Ajlan, was killed in front of his own fortress – Masmak fort.
      The Wahhabis did not welcome the presence of Christian forces in the Arabian Peninsula, as they would hardly tolerate the presence of other Muslims. Warlord Abdulaziz had to walk a political tightrope between the British, the Ottomans and the Wahhabis. But he proved to be a very able politician, as he understood that in order to get to his goal of reestablishing the Saudi State he may need the collaboration of all the above parties.
      While Warlord Abdulaziz was regaining the influence the Saud family lost during the previous decades, the Ottoman Empire was weakened to the point that they had to ask for Warlord Abdulaziz’s help in putting down the revolt in northern Yemen that was still under the Ottoman rule. Warlord Abdulaziz was also recapturing a lot of territories lost by his predecessors in the previous conflicts.The British did not interfere with Warlord Abdulaziz’s military advances as long as he stayed away from British controlled areas.
      The successes of Warlord Abdulaziz’s military campaigns also coincided with the revival of the religious zealotry in province of Najd. This time it was the descendant of Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab named Abdullah bin Abdul Latif, the religious judge, who promoted a new movement called Inkwan (the brotherhood).

      He demanded from his followers the strict adherence to the tenets of the Wahhabi ideology and one of the requirements was to avoid any contact with outsiders. He also encouraged creation of agricultural settlements and by the year 1920 dozens of those settlements were spread out around Najd.

      In the tradition of his 18th century relative, Latif and his Inkwan followers would raid the neighboring provinces instilling the Wahhabi system and killing anyone considered unbeliever or polytheist. They terrorized the Arab communities from Iraq to Transjordan, sometimes wiping out entire villages. Just within a few years the Inkwan gained enough power to have even Warlord Abdulaziz seek a partnership with them.

      This symbiotic relationship, between the most radical element of Saudi society and the ruling elite, continues to this day. Over the years that relationship would have ups and downs. Every time there was a move to modernize the Saudi society, the radicals would make sure that the princes would not stray too far off.

      Warlord Abdulaziz not only forged the partnership with the Inkwan but also provided them with financial help. In addition he appointed Inkwan members as religious judges even though most of them came from the primitive desert dwelling Bedouin societies and were not great Islamic scholars by any means. Those societies that live in the very harsh environments, like deserts or mountains, usually develop a very strict code of conduct that develops over hundreds of years. Inkwan have incorporated those tribal traditions into their view of Islam.

      The Arabian Peninsula at that time was not a place where people lived in peace and tranquility. It was a highly tribal society where disputes over land and infighting were common place. Warlord Abdulaziz needed to bring those feuding tribes under his control in order to rule the Arabian Peninsula. His partnership with the Inkwan allowed him to accomplish that. Just like a century before, the power of the sword backed by Wahhabi ideology has proven to be a winning formula.

      One after another the rebellious tribes accepted Ibn Wahhab as their imam (an Islamic religious leader), agreed to pay the customary taxes and live by the Wahhabi rules. But Warlord Abdulaziz had a problem. While he was trying the build a modern Arab state with railroads and telegraph and other technological innovations of that period, the Inkwan considered those to be the instruments of Satan. They were categorically against the presence of foreigners, even if it benefited them. Any form of expression including music or poetry was not allowed.

      The only intellectual activity tolerated was the study of the Quran. While Warlord Abdulaziz did not have a problem with forbidding music or poetry, he had a problem with Inkwan’s other goals namely kicking the British out and exterminating the neighboring populations. His dream was to establish a legitimate state and he could not do accomplish it with such excesses. He knew that eventually he would have to deal with Inkwan and that time came soon.
      In March of 1924, the Ottoman Empire caliphate was dissolved and Kamal Attaturk established the Turkish Republic. He specifically established the system where there was a clear separation of religion and the state, that is the cornerstone of the Turkish Republic to this day.

      During the Ottoman Caliphate the members of the Hashemite dynasty were the appointed rulers of Mecca and Medina. Hashemites were believed to be the direct descendants of the prophet Mohammed and the caretakers of the Holy places. With the history and tradition behind him, the latest representative of the dynasty,

      Sharif Hussein pronounced himself a caliph. He was a protégé of the British Government who vigorously promoted him. His goal was to become the ruler of all the Arabia. Obviously Warlord Abdulaziz had different ideas on who would rule Arabia. He declared the war on Sharif Hussein and in December of 1924 with the help of Inkwan captured the biggest prize – Mecca.

      There was nothing that the British could do but accept the shifting balance of power. They later promoted Sharif Hussein’s son Abdullah to become the King of Transjordan. But the Holiest places in Islam were no longer under the control of the Hashemite dynasty. Warlord Abdulaziz has reclaimed what was lost by his ancestors a century earlier. He immediately imposed the Wahhabi control over the religious and social matters. A year later he was in control of Medina and Jeddah.

      The consequences were far reaching. The one who was in charge of holy places had the eyes and ears of the entire Muslim world focused on them. Under Warlord Abdulaziz’s leadership Inkwan began the campaign of destruction of the priceless historical monuments. Any mosque or Kaba, Mecca graveyard that had a mention of the prophet on its walls was taken down, including the grave of Mohammed’s wife Kadijah.

      The Muslim world was outraged and demanded answers. Warlord Abdulaziz’s response was that his control over Mecca and Medina was temporary but in 1926 he hosted a global Islamic conference where he was able to convince the delegates from all over the Islamic world to ratify his control over the holy places.

      The time also came to deal with the Inkwan who wanted the British Army out. Warlord Abdulaziz knew that his rule over Arabian Peninsula could not survive without it. In fact it was the British who helped Warlord Abdulaziz to finally defeat the Inkwan in ensuing civil war.

      Having conquered almost all of central Arabia, UK supported warlord Abdulaziz united his dominions into the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932 with Riyadh as it’s capital and changed his name as King Saud bin Abdulaziz. Since then the House of Saud always supports UK and its allies including USA. Warlord Abdulaziz married more than twenty women and fathered over sixty eight children including all of the subsequent kings of Saudi Arabia.Today more than 7,000 princes in the House of Saud, the result of multiple wives and lots of progeny.

      With advances in technology that were based on oil, the western countries were getting more involved in the politics of the Middle East. Britain had a long-standing relationship with Warlord Abdulaziz, but it was with Standard Oil of California that he made a deal. Before signing the deal Warlord Abdulaziz consulted the ulama. His argument in favor of the Americans was that they, unlike the British, were not interested in territorial control of the Arab lands but only in oil.

      In addition the Americans were willing to pay more money and did not ask for the political concessions that British were demanding. The ulama has issued a fatwa allowing such deal. But it did not come without the price. The wahhabi religious establishment got complete control over the educational system and wahhabi religious policies of the kingdom.

      Within the decade, huge oil fields were discovered all over the Arabian Peninsula and in the Persian Gulf. The desert kingdom that only few years before survived on the revenues derived from the hajj and handouts from the British government became one of the most influential countries in the world. Saudi Arabia was already in control of Mecca and Medina, the holiest places in Islam.

      That alone gave them tremendous stature within the Muslim world. Now the great wealth derived from the oil revenues, and growing dependency of the Western economies on that oil, made the Saudis a major player in the world politics. In 1953 warlord Abdulaziz died. During his lifetime warlord Abdulaziz was able to take a land of feuding nomadic Bedouin tribes and in the span of few decades give them the country that became a wahhabi superpower.

      • Nalliah Thayabharan

        Upon the accession of eldest son of warlord Abdulaziz also named Saud to the throne in 1953, Prince Faisal was appointed as Crown Prince. The king Saud’s tenure was marred in controversy. He started spending lavishly on himself and his close circle while neglecting the basic needs of the country. His lifestyle did not always live up to his stature of the guardian of the holy places. Saud was also appointing his own sons to the most senior government positions surpassing the other more experienced members of the family. He would take long tours of Europe with a huge entourage that cost enormous amounts of money. When Saud’s brother Faisal, who acted as the deputy Prime Minister, proposed an increased budget for the modernization of the Saudi army, the Saud family and ulama approved it. The new reform cut down substantially on Saud’s personal budget, infuriating him. But his problems were far from over. The members of the Saud family and the ulama demanded King Saud to step down. In 1964 his brother Faisal Abdulaziz became the third king of Saudi Arabia and he went into exile in Greece and. Faisal was the son of warlord Abdulaziz and the direct descendant of the founder of Wahhabism, from his mother’ side. The Wahhabi creed was in his blood. He showed great interest in religious studies since he was a little boy and was able to forge strong relationships within the religious establishment.
        That served him well in his quest for the throne, as it was the ulama that played a major role in backing him against his deposed brother. During the Ibn Saud’s rule the religious establishment was playing a major role in internal politics of Saudi Arabia. Faisal decided to lean much more heavily on the ulama by giving them the unprecedented powers including the complete control of the educational system. He also created additional ministries that ended up under the control of the Wahhabis. His desire to strengthen Islam within the Saudi society prompted him to reform the Committee for Encouragement of Virtue and Discouragement of Vice (also known as the Committee for Public Morality). He expanded the powers of mutaween, the religious police, who could now stop and arrest anyone who did not dress or act according to the religious rules put into the law.
        The mutaween has maintained these powers to this day. A very tragic example of their power was exhibited in 2002, when a girls’ school in Mecca caught on fire. First on the scene were mutaween who actually sent the girls back into the burning building to put on head scarves to preserve their modesty before they could be rescued. Fifteen girls were killed many more injured.

counter for wordpress