Published On: Sat, Jan 2nd, 2010

MF Husain: Resolving the Controversy

MF_Hussain1By U. Mahesh Prabhu

Maqbool Fida Husain, popularly known as M. F. Husain, or simply Husain, is now living abroad – in Dubai. He has been living there after his “self-imposed exile”. Revered by many as a painter – an artist extraordinaire – millions are spent by people to buy his masterpiece and the kind of publicity and support he enjoys with the Indian elite is truly enviable.

He has so less to complain about India or Indians. And as per distinguished journalist Kuldip Nayar in his “Leaders & Misleaders” column in COVERT (15-31 December, 2009 issue) he “wasn’t bitter, nor was he against any political party.” This, according to Nayar, was when he was speaking on the eve of his 95th birthday celebrations.

According to Nayar, in the very same piece, MF Husain is “sorry that his country’s ethos of freedom of thought and speech had got clouded. He did not blame anyone for his plight, but he stirred the conscience of those present in the room. They realized they should have spoken out in his support…”

I have been born and brought up in India. I have travelled remote corners of this land, not in search of controversial stories like other journalists, but as a humble traveller with an eye for intricacies of its culture. Every square piece of this land has so much to offer. If anyone is to suggest that “India is no more” unity in diversity I can just prove them otherwise in no time. The restraint, understanding as well as loving nature of our countrymen are lauded by everyone. Given this is – which IS TRUE – a question is certain to popup in one’s mind. Why are they so much against M. F. Husain? What did they do?

To resolve the controversy and to bring back Husain it is imperative that we have the RIGHT answers for those questions. Because loosing a great artist like Husain to an alien land is a matter of disgrace for me too. But when he is back I want to ensure, also, that my other fellow Indians aren’t hurt.

Indians are very peace loving. Yes, you may well talk of all the riots to suggest otherwise. But that’s for the sake of argument. Even in your house you can seldom assure of perfect peace – misgiving and accidents do occur. But to keep those misgivings forever is to be unwise. We need to have a big heart to forgive. I sincerely feel that Indians do, and still, have it.

MF Husain is considered “guilty” by people who protest him only for one reason: He paints Hindu deities like Saraswati and even Bharath Mata (Mother India) nude. They suggest that “he has never drawn any Muslim legends so…” And the argument is so true.

Now the question is simple: Do either parties, i.e. MF Husain and his strong critics, wish to resolve the issue? I haven’t met MF Husain but I have spoken to most of his staunchest critics. And after arguments with them I have understood that they are willing to settle down for a compromise if only MF Husain could admit his apology and destroy ONLY THOSE PAINTINGS. Some critics are even willing to compensate for his financial loss – just in case. Aren’t those reasonable?

Protagonists of Husain like Nayar himself have something to add forth this regard. They suggest that “He has depicted Hindu goddesses as an artist sees them. There is more nudity in Konark and Khajuraho than in his paintings…” But that’s a half truth. Isn’t “half truth a whole lie”? This may be unconscious mistake due to lack of knowledge on subject matter. They have failed to note that Konark and Khajuraho’s nudity isn’t on goddesses. As a recognized scholar in Asiatic arts and culture I am competent enough to assert, and even prove, it.

If only the humility of MF Husain could care to heed to the feelings of his very own countrymen I am sure he will be able to apologize and thereby destroy his painting with a promise to never repeat the mistake again.

Husain has, certainly, apologized before. But, I am afraid, his apologies were not honest. He drew couple of more paintings after that. If the violence of his critics is a sin then their instigator (Husain himself) too is no less a sinner.

With all those writing for and against him we have begun creating discord amongst ourselves. This is so unwise. Violence or negations will beget zilch but destruction.

It is important to note that Indians aren’t fanatics like Islamists. They have sought not his head but an apology. I am confident that if only MF Husain could sincerely apologize, his critics would not just forgive him but also laud him for being so understanding. But will he apologize? Would his protagonists persuade?

Time is a great healer. Let us all hope for the best. And yes… India needs MF Husain.

Author is Editor-in-chief of Folks Magazine and Fellow of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, London (UK).

  • Dipanjan Basu

    “Indians aren’t fanatics like Islamists.” — very true. And, “Indians” include Muslims as well. However, I believe the controversy on Hussain is a Hindu propaganda and rightly so because nudity, although an inherent part of ancient Indian (Hindu) culture (perhaps??), was depicted rather naturally in the sculptures and not ostentatiously as was done by Hussain. It just shows lack of proper “culture” on the part of Hussain to have drawn nude pictures of Hindu Goddess. If some one draws a nude picture of Prophet Muhammad, then I am not sure that Hussain would be able to accept it as an “artist’s work”.

    Finally, I differ on the final conclusions of the author. We Indians (that includes Muslims, I believe) are too passive to the extent foreigners see that as our weakness. We have portrayed Gandhi as our father and have downgraded the contributions of the likes of Bhagat Singh and Netaji in our freedom struggle. This is simply wrong! Whereas we are peace loving, rather spiritual minded and quite forgiving, there should be a clear line drawn between what is acceptable and what is not. A simple apology for Hussain is just not acceptable. He must “act” sorry and carry the integrated “Indian” ethos without hurting any particular religion.

  • Dr. Vidyut Katagade

    Respected Shri Basu,
    You are welcome to have and promote your views on what you think CULTURE, RELIGION and ESTHETICS should amount to. But we as human beings have come further than those who think (and often ACT) with ‘A HAND FOR A HAND and AN EYE FOR AN EYE form of justice. I would request you NOT to go on that RETROGRADE PATH if you feel an iota of pride for what being tolerant is all about. At least IT IS NOT A CHOICE of the WEAK in my humble opinion.
    Abusing the opponent with epithet involving his mother or sister doesn’t present anyone on a MORALLY STRONGER/ HIGHER ground.
    I would go NO further to turn your individual opinion in favour of my point of view.

    -vidyut

  • Dipanjan Basu

    Dear Dr. Katagade,

    I respect your opinion and agree with the fact that we, as human beings and perhaps particularly as Indians, should be tolerant. I take great pride in doing that and have been doing so thus far. However, I have started thinking a little bit differently of late. I reside in the United States and, whereas it has helped me immensely in this society (in work and in social gathering) by declaring myself Indian because Americans appreciate our spiritual heritage, culture and our “brains”, they do see us as an extremely “passive” nation who do not even know how to defend themselves. That hurts!

    Look what is going on with our protests to Australia or Pakistan. It is so passive! It may be “diplomatic” (I do believe that diplomacy has an important role to play) but I am not sure that it is working. At the end of the day, we, the Indians, suffer and no one else cares about us. Thus, I believe we should be more aggressive than we fundamentally are. That, however, does not mean we have to break laws or civil liberties or good human values. There is a room for controlled aggression within the bounds of civility. That is what I suggested. An eye for an eye would be if Hindu artists draw paintings related to Islam that is offensive in reply to Mr. Hussain’s act. I am not advocating that. At the same time, I do not believe that we should just let Mr. Hussain go without paying adequate price for his unacceptable act. In my opinion, simply saying a “sorry” and going on with life is not acceptable. Mr. Hussain must show genuine regards for Indian society he wants to be called an Indian. This is, again, my opinion.

    Best Regards,

    Dipanjan Basu

counter for wordpress